COUNTERMEASURES AND DEFENSES FOR AI-DRIVEN CYBER ATTACKS

COUNTERMEASURES AND DEFENSES FOR AI-DRIVEN CYBER ATTACKS

Babatope Olosunde & Paul Anoruem 2024

Abstract: The rapid advancement of generative AI which includes Language Models (LLMs) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) has led to an increase in cyberattacks driven by AI thereby posing serious threats to organizations as attacks such as phishing, disinformation, malware, and data breaches have become more and more sophisticated. In response to these challenges, this article explores comprehensive countermeasures and defences which include Content Verification, Code Analysis, and Behaviour Detection in mitigating the risks associated with AI-driven attacks.

Content verification techniques including digital signatures, watermarking, hashing, reverse image search, fact-checking, and forensic analysis allow organizations to verify the legitimacy and origin of digital assets are examined as potent tools to validate the authenticity and integrity of generated content and play a crucial role in preventing and detecting cyber threats created by AI (Rajeswari, 2023, Upadhyay et al., 2023).  To examine the code produced by AI, code analysis helps detect dangerous activities like malware, exploits, and backdoors by analysing syntax, behaviour, and trends of certain codes (Poornima, 2023) using static and dynamic analysis, symbolic execution, code similarity, code quality, and code style is investigated. Critical techniques for identifying anomalous or malevolent activity in AI-generated software, systems, or devices include anomaly detection, signature detection, machine learning, network traffic analysis, system log analysis, and user behaviour analysis and these methods contribute significantly to the prevention and detection of cyber threats like botnets, ransomware, and data exfiltration (Pal, 2023).

Content Verification

Content verification is the procedure of ensuring that digital content is real and has not been edited, manipulated, or misrepresented. In the context of artificial intelligence and cybersecurity, content verification is an important component of defence systems against a variety of cyber threats, including phishing, disinformation, and data breaches and can be performed by various methods, such as digital signatures, watermarking, hashing, or cryptography, that can prove the origin, ownership, or validity of the content (Rajeswari, 2023, Upadhyay et al., 2023). Alternatively, content verification can be performed by various techniques, such as reverse image search, fact-checking, or forensic analysis, that can expose inconsistencies, anomalies, or traces of the content.

Some examples of content verification methods and techniques are:

• Digital signatures: Digital signatures are a cryptographic method that can verify the identity and integrity of the sender and the content of a message, such as an email, a document, or a transaction. Digital signatures help prevent or detect phishing or data breaches, as they can ensure that the message is sent by a legitimate sender and that the content is not tampered with (Xu, 2023).
• Watermarking: Watermarking is a method that can embed a hidden or visible mark, such as a logo, a text, or a code, into the content, such as an image, a video, or a document. Watermarking can help prevent or detect disinformation or data breaches, as it can indicate the source, ownership, or validity of the content (Shkilev et al., 2024).
• Hashing: Hashing is a method that can generate a unique and fixed-length string, called a hash, from the content, such as a file, a message, or a password which can help prevent or detect data breaches, as they can ensure that the content is not modified or leaked (Joy & Devaraju, 2023).
• Reverse image search: Reverse image search is a technique that can find the original or similar images on the web-based on an input image, such as a deepfake, a photo, or a screenshot. Reverse image search can help prevent or detect disinformation or data breaches, as they can reveal the source, context, or manipulation of the image (Jones & Oyen, 2023)
• Fact-checking: Fact-checking is a technique that can verify the accuracy and credibility of information, such as a news article, a social media post, or a claim. Fact-checking can help prevent or detect disinformation or data breaches, as they can expose the falsehood, bias, or inconsistency of the information (DeVerna et al., 2023).
• Forensic analysis: Forensic analysis is a technique that can examine the details and features of the content, such as an image, a video, or a document, to identify the signs of manipulation, such as artifacts, distortions, or inconsistencies. Forensic analysis can help prevent or detect disinformation or data breaches, as it can reveal the methods, tools, or traces of the manipulation (Lee et al., 2023).

Code Analysis

Code analysis is the act of inspecting and assessing a software program's source code to obtain insight into its structure, behaviour, and overall quality with the fundamental purpose of guaranteeing that the code complies with coding standards, is free of vulnerabilities, and follows established software development best practices. This analysis can be done manually or, more typically, with the use of automated software which helps prevent or detect cyberattacks, such as malware, exploit, or backdoor, that use malicious or obfuscated code to compromise or harm the victims. Code analysis can be performed by various methods, such as static analysis, dynamic analysis, or symbolic execution, that can examine the structure, behaviour, or logic of the code (Kharat et al., 2019). Alternatively, code analysis can be performed by various techniques, such as code similarity, code quality, or code style, that can measure the characteristics, features, or patterns of the code.

Some examples of code analysis methods and techniques are:

• Static analysis: Static analysis is a method that can analyse the code without executing it, by checking the syntax, semantics, or dependencies of the code. Static analysis can help prevent or detect malware, exploits, or backdoors, as they can identify the errors, vulnerabilities, or malicious functions of the code (Xu et al., 2024).
• Dynamic analysis: Dynamic analysis is a method that can analyse the code by executing it, and by monitoring the input, output, or state of the code. Dynamic analysis can help prevent or detect malware, exploits, or backdoors, as they can observe the behaviour, performance, or impact of the code (Gapon et al., 2023).
• Symbolic execution: Symbolic execution is a method that can analyse the code by executing it with symbolic values, and by exploring the possible paths, outcomes, or constraints of the code. Symbolic execution can help prevent or detect malware, exploits, or backdoors, as they can discover the conditions, effects, or limitations of the code (Mouzaran, 2022).
• Code similarity: Code similarity is a technique that can measure the similarity or difference between two or more code snippets, by comparing the syntax, semantics, or functionality of the code. Code similarity can help prevent or detect malware, exploits, or backdoors, as they can detect the plagiarism, modification, or reuse of the code (Abba et al., 2022).
• Code quality: Code quality is a technique that can measure the quality or complexity of the code, by evaluating the readability, maintainability, or efficiency of the code. Code quality can help prevent or detect malware, exploits, or backdoors, as they can assess the clarity, simplicity, or optimization of the code (De Silva et al., 2023).
• Code style: Code style is a technique that can measure the style or pattern of the code, by analysing the formatting, naming, or convention of the code. Code style can help prevent or detect malware, exploits, or backdoors, as they can recognize the consistency, uniqueness, or preference of the code (Ting et al., 2023).

Behaviour Detection

Behaviour detection is the process of detecting the behaviour of a software, system, or device that is generated or modified by generative AI, such as LLMs, GANs, or other techniques (Price and Sakellarios, 2023). This technique can help prevent or detect cyberattacks, such as botnets, ransomware, or data exfiltration, that use malicious or evasive behaviour to compromise or harm the victims. Behaviour detection can be performed by various methods, such as anomaly detection, signature detection, or machine learning, that can identify the normal, abnormal, or malicious behaviour of the software, system, or device. Alternatively, behaviour detection can be performed by various techniques, such as network traffic analysis, that can monitor the activity, event, or interaction of the software, system, or device.

Some examples of behaviour detection methods and techniques are:

• Anomaly detection: Anomaly detection is a method that can detect the behaviour that deviates from the normal or expected behaviour of the software, system, or device, by using statistical, probabilistic, or clustering techniques. Anomaly detection can help prevent or detect botnet, ransomware, or data exfiltration, as they can spot the unusual, suspicious, or abnormal behaviour of the software, system, or device (Gürfidan et al., 2023).
• Signature detection: Signature detection is a method that can detect the behaviour that matches the predefined or known behaviour of the software, system, or device, by using rules, patterns, or signatures. Signature detection can help prevent or detect botnet, ransomware, or data exfiltration, as they can match the specific, characteristic, or malicious behaviour of the software, system, or device (Rupasinghe et al., 2023).
• Machine learning: Machine learning is a method that can detect the behaviour that is learned from the data or feedback of the software, system, or device, by using supervised, unsupervised, or reinforcement learning techniques. Machine learning can help prevent or detect botnet, ransomware, or data exfiltration, as they can adapt to the changing, complex, or unknown behaviour of the software, system, or device (Prateek, 2024).
• Network traffic analysis: Network traffic analysis is a technique that can monitor the network traffic that is generated or received by the software, system, or device, by using packet capture, flow analysis, or protocol analysis. Network traffic analysis can help prevent or detect botnet, ransomware, or data exfiltration, as they can measure the volume, frequency, or content of the network traffic (Alshammari & Aldribi, 2021).

Conclusion:

As the field of AI continues to advance, the threats posed by AI-driven cyberattacks become increasingly sophisticated and pervasive. A holistic defence strategy that integrates Content Verification, Code Analysis, and Behaviour Detection is imperative for organizations wishing to navigate the complex landscape of AI-driven cyber threats and by adopting these complex countermeasures, organizations can enhance their cybersecurity resilience and effectively safeguard against the evolving tactics employed by AI-driven adversaries. This article has delved into the critical domains of Content Verification, Code Analysis, and Behaviour Detection, presenting a comprehensive set of countermeasures and defences to mitigate the risks associated with AI-driven attacks.

References

1. Abba, H., Roko, A., Muhammad, A., Usman, A. and Almu, A., 2022. Enhanced semantic similarity detection of program code using siamese neural network. International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications, 14, pp.5353-5360. https://doi.org/10.35444/IJANA.2022.14205
2. Alshammari, A. and Aldribi, A., 2021. Apply machine learning techniques to detect malicious network traffic in cloud computing. Journal of Big Data, 8, p.90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00475-1
3. De Silva, D., Dias, T., Katipearachchi, M., Sachethana, O., Perera, Y. and Jayasuriya, D., 2023. The relationship between code complexity and software quality: an empirical study. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development, 11(1), p.1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40411-023-0014-8
4. DeVerna, M., Yan, H., Yang, K-C. and Menczer, F., 2023. Fact-checking information generated by a large language model can decrease news discernment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10800. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.10800
5. Gapon, A.O., Fedorchenko, V.M. and Sievierinov, O., 2023. Methods and means of static and dynamic code analysis. Radiotekhnika, pp.7-13. https://doi.org/10.30837/rt.2023.1.212.01
6. Gürfidan, R., Atmaca, Ş., YİĞİT, T., 2023. Real-time intelligent anomaly detection and prevention system. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 6. https://doi.org/10.35377/saucis…1296210
7. Jones, S. and Oyen, D., 2023. Abstract images have different levels of retrievability per reverse image search engine. In: Advances in Information Retrieval. Springer, pp.167-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25085-9_12
8. Joy, J. and Devaraju, S., 2023. Ensuring data integrity and security in diverse cloud environments to prevent duplicacy. Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology, 44, pp.1001-4055. https://doi.org/10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i4.1798
9. Kharat, A., Kumbhakarn, S., Kolhe, A., Telang, A. and Naglot, D., 2019. Code review and analysis using deep learning. In: 2019 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP). IEEE, pp.1084-1088. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSP.2019.8697954
10. Lee, J., Jeon, S., Park, Y., Chung, J. and Jeong, D., 2023. A forensic methodology for detecting image manipulations. Journal of Digital Forensic Practice, 13(1), pp.1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567268.2023.1867129
11. Mouzarani, M., Kamali, A., Baradaran, S. and Heidari, M., 2022. A unit-based symbolic execution method for detecting heap overflow vulnerability in executable codes. In: Tests and Proofs. Springer, pp.89-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09827-7_6
12. Pal, S., 2023. The nexus of AI and cybersecurity: an in-depth analysis of machine learning and deep learning techniques in anomaly detection. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 8, p.759. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcp8020076
13. Poornima, R., 2023. An inclusive report on robust malware detection and analysis for cross-version binary code optimizations. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11, pp.927-937. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i9.8985
14. Price, G. and Sakellarios, M., 2023. The effectiveness of free software for detecting AI-generated writing. International Journal of Teaching, Learning and Education, 2(6), pp.31-38. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijtle.2.6.4
15. Rajeswari, M., 2023. A review study on various image security techniques and emerging trends for visual data protection. Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology, 44, pp.4213-4237. https://doi.org/10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i3.2310
16. Rana, P., 2024. Role of machine learning in cybersecurity: techniques and challenges. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12, pp.44-48. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset…57786
17. Security, C., Rupasinghe, P., Liyanapathirana, C., Punyasiri, S., 2023. Signature & behavior based malware detection. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG…2…22127…20640
18. Shkilev, R., Kormiltseva, A., Achaeva, M., Tarasova, A., Matquliyeva, M., 2024. Fortifying textual integrity: evolutionary optimization-powered watermarking for tampering attack detection in digital documents. Fusion: Practice and Applications, 14, pp.97-108. https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.140208
19. Ting, C-K., Munson, K., Wade, S., Savla, A., Kate, K., Srinivas, K., 2023. CodeStylist: a system for performing code style transfer using neural networks. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, pp.16485-16487. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i13…27087
20. Upadhyay, S., Kumar, M., Upadhyay, A., Verma, S., Kavita, Hosen, A.S.M.S., Ra, I-H., Kaur, M. and Singh, S., 2023. Digital image identification and verification using maximum and preliminary score approach with watermarking for security and validation enhancement. Electronics, 12(7), p.1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12071609
21. Xu, Y., Zhang, M., Wang, X., Chen, J., Liang, R., Zhen, Y. and Zhen, C., 2024. A review of code vulnerability detection techniques based on static analysis. In: Software Engineering and Algorithms in Intelligent Systems. Springer, pp.221-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44947-5_21
22. Xu, Z., 2023. The advance of digital signature with quantum computing. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 39, pp.1111-1121. https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v39i.6716